The Zong: A Call to Conscience for Modern Insurance

I. Introduction: The Unforgettable Tragedy of the Zong

Revisiting the Zong: A Story That Demands Remembrance

The Zong massacre, a horrific event from 1781, represents one of the most stark examples of human depravity driven by perverse financial logic within the transatlantic slave trade. This report aims to bring this little-known but profoundly significant historical event to the forefront, as it serves as a critical lens through which to examine the ethical foundations of commerce and the enduring struggle for human dignity. The narrative of the Zong is one that, by all rights, should be part of the curriculum of every aspiring insurance professional. Yet, as observed by many, its absence from standard industry curricula is deafening, forcing a difficult question: did the insurance industry, at its inception, ever truly have a soul? This report seeks to fill that void, transforming a personal revelation into a foundational document for ethical reflection.

The Enduring Echoes: Why This History Matters Today

The Zong case, while a specific historical incident, offers universal lessons about the dangers of commodifying human life, the moral hazards inherent when profit becomes the sole arbiter of value, and the critical role of moral conviction in challenging systemic injustice. The event has been explored extensively in terms of its legal implications, particularly concerning insurance law, and the commercial logic underpinning the British slave trade.¹ Its legacy extends far beyond the 18th century, resonating with contemporary discussions on corporate social responsibility and ethical leadership. The Zong massacre serves as a powerful reminder of how systems, even those as seemingly mundane as insurance, can lose their way when divorced from a fundamental respect for human life.

Purpose of this Report: Deepening Understanding and Inspiring Ethical Action

This report will provide a comprehensive historical account of the Zong massacre, detailing the conditions that led to the atrocity, the legal proceedings that ensued, and the pivotal role the case played in galvanizing the British abolitionist movement. It will then draw explicit connections between these historical lessons and the modern mission of organizations committed to ethical practice, advocating for a return to ethical and moral foundations in industries like insurance. This includes a commitment to restoring a lost sense of purpose, believing that every client is not merely a claim number but a person, a neighbor, striving to bring order to the chaos of loss, and tirelessly advocating for just and equitable compensation. Such work represents a humble attempt to manifest a small measure of divine justice in the world.

II. The Voyage of Depravity: Conditions and Decisions Aboard the Zong

The Zong's Ill-Fated Journey: Overcrowding, Disease, and Navigational Errors

The Zong, originally a Dutch ship named Zorg (meaning "Care"), was captured by the British in 1781 and subsequently acquired by the Liverpool-based Gregson syndicate.² It departed Accra, Gold Coast (modern Ghana), on August 18, 1781, with an astonishing 442 enslaved Africans on board, a number more than double its safe capacity.² The ratio of enslaved people to ship tonnage on the Zong was 4.0 per ton, significantly higher than the typical British ship's 1.75 per ton, underscoring the extreme overcrowding that characterized this voyage.²

The Middle Passage itself was notoriously brutal, defined by inhumane conditions that fostered rampant disease, malnutrition, and death. Enslaved people were shackled and crammed below decks with barely enough room to sit up or move around, leading to suffocation, "loathsome smells," and "copious perspirations".⁴ Historical accounts describe the decks becoming "so covered with the blood and mucus... that it resembled a slaughter-house".⁴ Approximately 15% of enslaved people died during the voyage due to these abhorrent conditions.⁴ By late November 1781, as the Zong approached the Caribbean, 62 enslaved Africans and four crew members had already succumbed to the dire circumstances.²

Compounding these horrors, Captain Luke Collingwood was gravely ill, and the command structure aboard the ship was unclear, contributing to critical navigational errors.² The crew sighted Jamaica on November 27 or 28 but mistakenly identified it as Saint-Domingue, overshooting their destination by 300 miles.² This profound error, combined with dwindling water supplies, tragically set the stage for the massacre. The crisis aboard the Zong was not solely a reaction to an unforeseen navigational mistake but an exacerbated situation stemming from the inherent, profit-driven brutality and overcrowding that was standard practice in the slave trade.⁴ The negligence extended beyond navigation; it was a fundamental disregard for human life built into the very design and operation of the slave ship, where maximizing "cargo" was prioritized over basic human welfare. This illustrates how systemic depravity can create conditions where "calculated cruelty" becomes a perceived necessity, blurring the lines between accident and intentional harm.

Captain Collingwood's Horrific Order: Calculated Murder for Profit

On November 29, 1781, facing perceived water scarcity and fearing further losses (which would not be insurable if deaths occurred from disease or on land), Captain Luke Collingwood and his crew made a horrifying decision.⁸ They decided to "jettison" human beings, treating them as "spoiled cargo" to be claimed under insurance.² This decision was explicitly driven by an economic incentive: the crew members would receive a monetary bonus based on the average value of enslaved people sold, making the "ill ones" a financial liability.¹²

Over three days, in three batches, they brutally murdered enslaved Africans by throwing them overboard: 54 women and children on November 29, 42 men on December 1, and a further 36 in the following days.² Additionally, 10 enslaved people, in an act of defiance, chose to commit suicide by jumping into the sea.⁸ The total death toll from the massacre reached 142 or 143 individuals.² Crucially, evidence later emerged that heavy rain had fallen on December 1, providing enough water for 11 days, yet the killings continued.² The ship arrived in Jamaica on December 22 with 420 gallons of water still on board.² This directly contradicted the crew's claim of "absolute necessity".¹⁰

The crew's argument was based on "necessity" to justify the jettisoning under the "perils of the sea" clause.¹⁰ However, the fact that rain fell after the initial killings, and that a significant amount of water remained on board upon arrival, demonstrates that the "necessity" was either fabricated, exaggerated, or a self-serving rationalization for a financially motivated act. The core motivation was to convert an uninsurable loss (death by disease/malnutrition, which was not covered) into an insurable one (death by jettisoning to save the ship, covered under "general average").² This reveals a profound moral corruption where the concept of "necessity" was twisted to justify mass murder for economic gain. It underscores how financial incentives, when unchecked by ethical considerations and coupled with the dehumanization of individuals, can lead to the most heinous acts, demonstrating a deliberate subversion of ethical responsibility.

The Human Cost: A Detailed Account of the Massacre's Victims

The victims of the Zong massacre were not merely numbers but individuals with lives brutally cut short. The act was not a random jettisoning but a calculated process, initially targeting the "sick and dying," whom the crew deemed "spoiled cargo" that would lower the average value of the surviving enslaved people.¹¹ The desperate act of 10 enslaved people choosing suicide by leaping into the sea rather than being murdered by the crew serves as a harrowing testament to the unspeakable horrors they faced.⁸ This specific detail adds a layer of profound human tragedy and resilience to the narrative. The act of choosing death over continued suffering or being thrown overboard by their captors is a powerful, albeit tragic, form of resistance and a profound indictment of the conditions on the ship. It speaks to a level of despair so deep that death was preferable, and a refusal to be utterly dehumanized by the act of being "jettisoned." It is an assertion of humanity in the face of its denial, moving beyond the passive victimhood implied by "cargo" and highlighting the extreme psychological torment and the desperate assertion of agency by those facing unimaginable horror.

III. The Legal Abyss: Insurance, Property, and the Gregson v. Gilbert Case

Human Beings as "Cargo": The Perverse Logic of Slave Insurance

When the Zong's owners, the Gregson syndicate, filed an insurance claim for the murdered enslaved people, they did so under the premise that these human beings were nothing more than "cargo" or "goods" lost at sea.² This was standard practice in the transatlantic slave trade, where enslaved people were routinely insured as property, like "horses" or "wood".² The claim was for £30 per head, based on the average value of the surviving enslaved people sold in Jamaica.¹⁰ This "valued policy" system meant that a pre-agreed value was placed on each enslaved person, facilitating claims even in cases of deliberate killing for profit.¹²

The fact that insurance policies explicitly covered enslaved people as "cargo" and even allowed for claims in cases of deliberate jettisoning under "general average" demonstrates that the industry was not merely a passive financial service.² It actively codified and legitimized the dehumanization of enslaved people by assigning them monetary value as property, thereby reducing them to insurable commodities. This financial mechanism directly enabled and incentivized the atrocities of the slave trade by mitigating financial risk for slave traders, making the "business" more palatable and profitable. This reveals a deep ethical failure at the foundational level of the industry, where profit motives superseded any consideration of human dignity. It underscores how financial instruments can become tools of oppression when divorced from moral principles, creating a system where human suffering is an insurable loss rather than an inherent wrong.

The "Perils of the Sea" and the "Necessity" Defense: Legal Arguments Unpacked

The legal case, Gregson v. Gilbert, centered on whether the deaths fell under "perils of the sea" and if the jettisoning was an act of "necessity" to save the ship and remaining "cargo".² The plaintiffs argued that an "imminent insurrection" from water-deprived captives necessitated the killings, even though no actual insurrection had occurred.¹⁰ This argument was a "curious" attempt to frame a pre-emptive, speculative action as a response to an existing peril.¹⁵ Solicitor General John Lee, representing the owners, famously argued that "Blacks are goods and property; it is madness to accuse these well-serving honourable men of murder.... The case is the same as if wood had been thrown overboard".⁷ This chilling statement epitomizes the legal system's complicity in the dehumanization, prioritizing property rights over human life.

Lord Mansfield's Judgment: A Glimmer of Moral Discomfort in a Legalistic World

Initially, a jury at London's Guildhall ruled in favor of the ship owners, awarding them £3,660.¹⁰ However, the insurers appealed, not on humanitarian grounds, but due to "errors of navigation and mismanagement" and concerns about being "fleeced".¹⁴ Lord Mansfield, the Lord Chief Justice, presided over the appeal in May 1783. While he made the notorious comment equating enslaved people to "horses" for legal purposes, he also expressed that the case "shocks one very much".¹⁰ Crucially, new evidence was presented, including the fact that rain had fallen after some of the killings, undermining the "necessity" argument.²

Mansfield ordered a new trial, ruling that the captain and crew were at fault and that the losses were not due to "perils of the sea" but rather their mismanagement.² This decision was a technical legal victory for the insurers, not a moral condemnation of the murders. Mansfield's ruling for a new trial was not based on the inherent immorality of the act, but on the technicality of the captain's fault and the false premise of "necessity".² This highlights how legal systems, even when they appear to deliver a "just" outcome, can still operate within a morally bankrupt framework, prioritizing property law over human rights. However, the revelation of the rain proved to be the critical factual detail that broke the "necessity" defense, demonstrating how even within a flawed system, rigorous factual integrity can expose underlying lies and shift outcomes, even if for technical rather than moral reasons.

The Unresolved Outcome: No Justice, But a Catalyst for Change

Crucially, the ordered second trial "does not seem to have taken place," meaning the Zong's owners "did not get their money".¹⁰ While this was a financial setback for the slave traders, no one was ever prosecuted for murder, despite Granville Sharp's efforts.⁷ The Solicitor General, John Lee, famously refused, stating, "This is a case of chattels or goods. Blacks are goods and property; it is madness to accuse these well-serving honourable men of murder".⁷

Despite the lack of criminal justice, the publicity surrounding the Gregson v. Gilbert case was immense. It became a "cause célèbre" and a "pivotal moment" for the burgeoning abolitionist movement, exposing the "inhumanity of the slave trade in graphic detail" and serving as a "rallying cry".² The Zong case became a "marker of the extreme depravity that characterised the trade".⁷ The legal outcome of Gregson v. Gilbert was a financial loss for the owners but a moral non-event for the victims, as no murder charges were brought. However, the widespread public exposure of the case, largely due to Granville Sharp and Olaudah Equiano, transformed it into a powerful symbol. This indicates that even when formal legal channels fail to deliver justice, public awareness and moral condemnation can become a potent force for broader societal change. The Zong case became a "marker of the extreme depravity" that fueled the abolitionist movement, demonstrating that moral victories can precede and ultimately drive legal and political ones.

The Broader Landscape: The Insurance Industry's Deep Involvement in the Slave Trade

The Zong case was not an isolated incident but symptomatic of the insurance industry's deep integration into the transatlantic slave trade. Lloyd's of London, for instance, was the "global centre for insuring that industry" from 1640 to the early 19th century, during which an estimated 3.2 million enslaved Africans were transported by Britain's shipping industry.²⁰ Slave insurance was standard practice, with policies covering the "damage to or death of their slaves".² Premiums on black lives were often double those on white lives, reflecting perceived higher risks, and policies were frequently reviewed for health or occupation changes.²² Policies were often limited to two-thirds of the slave's value and short terms (1-7 years) to mitigate moral hazard and market fluctuations.²²

Numerous other companies, including predecessors to modern firms like Aetna (Aetna Life Insurance Company), AIG (United States Life Insurance Company), and New York Life (Nautilus Insurance Company), were involved in underwriting slave risks, issuing policies on individual enslaved people, and paying out claims.²¹ Some academics suggest that the West Indian trade, fueled by enslaved labor, accounted for up to 40% of cargo insurance premiums in the London market.¹⁴ Slavery-related voyages alone constituted 26.4% to 29% of all risks underwritten by the London Assurance Company.²³

The pervasive nature of insuring enslaved people was not a niche market but a significant and integral part of the British and global insurance industry.²⁰ The high percentage of cargo premiums and risks related to slavery indicates a deep financial incentive for the industry to maintain the slave trade by de-risking it for slaveholders and traders. This goes beyond individual policies to illustrate a systemic financial dependency on human exploitation, where insurance acted as a crucial enabler of the slave economy. This demonstrates how economic systems can become deeply complicit in moral atrocities, not just through direct participation but through the provision of essential services that de-risk and thus enable heinous practices. It highlights the long-term ethical liabilities that can accrue from such historical involvement, necessitating modern reckoning and responsibility within the financial sector.

Table 1: Key Events and Timeline of the Zong Massacre and Legal Proceedings

Date (Month/Day/Year)	Event Description	Key Figures Involved	Outcome/Significance
August 18, 1781	Zong departs Accra, Gold Coast	Captain Luke Collingwood, Gregson Syndicate	Ship overloaded with 442 enslaved Africans (4.0 per ton vs. typical 1.75) 2
Sept 6, 1781	Zong begins transatlantic voyage to Jamaica	Captain Luke Collingwood	Voyage commences from São Tomé 2
Nov 27/28, 1781	Crew sights Jamaica but misidentifies it	Captain Luke Collingwood, crew	Overshoots destination by 300 miles; water supplies dwindling 2
Nov 29, 1781	Massacre begins (first batch)	Captain Luke Collingwood, crew	54 women and children thrown overboard 2
Dec 1, 1781	Massacre continues (second batch)	Captain Luke Collingwood, crew	42 male enslaved people thrown overboard; heavy rain falls, providing water 2
Early Dec 1781	Massacre continues (third batch)	Captain Luke Collingwood, crew	36 more enslaved Africans thrown overboard; 10 commit suicide 2
Dec 22, 1781	Zong arrives in Black River, Jamaica	Captain Luke Collingwood, crew	Arrives with 208 enslaved people; 420 gallons of water remaining 2
January 1782	Surviving enslaved people sold	Gregson Syndicate	Survivors sold for average £36 per person 2
March 6, 1783	First Trial: Gregson v. Gilbert (Guildhall)	Gregson Syndicate, insurers, jury	Jury rules in favor of ship owners, awarding £3,660 10
March 19, 1783	Olaudah Equiano alerts Granville Sharp	Olaudah Equiano, Granville Sharp	News of massacre and trial reaches abolitionists, sparking outrage 7
May 21-22, 1783	Appeal Hearing: Gregson v. Gilbert (King's Bench)	Lord Mansfield, Gregson Syndicate, insurers, Granville Sharp	Mansfield orders new trial based on new evidence (rain), ruling captain at fault 2
Post-May 1783	Second trial never takes place	Gregson Syndicate, insurers	Owners do not receive insurance payment; no one prosecuted for murder 10
1787	Society for Effecting the Abolition of the Slave Trade founded	Granville Sharp, Thomas Clarkson	Zong case a direct catalyst for organized abolitionist movement 7
1788	John Newton publishes "Thoughts upon the African Slave Trade"	John Newton	Public confession and condemnation of the trade 27
1807	Slave Trade Act passed by British Parliament	William Wilberforce	Abolition of slave trade in British Empire 6
1833	Slavery Abolition Act passed	William Wilberforce	Abolition of slavery in most British colonies 6

Table 2: Insurance Industry Involvement in the Transatlantic Slave Trade (Selected Examples)

Company/Predecessor Name	Period of Involvement	Type of Involvement	Specific Examples/Statistics	Key Ethical/Business Implication
Lloyd's of London	1640s - early 19th C	Marine cargo insurance for slave ships	Global center for insuring British shipping industry, transporting ~3.2 million enslaved Africans 20	Systemic financial entrenchment in human exploitation
Insurance Co. of North America (ICNA) / Aetna Fire (Ace USA predecessor)	1855	Life insurance for individual enslaved people	Policy written for slave named Peter in Mississippi 21	Direct financial benefit from human chattel
Aetna Life Insurance Company (ALIC)	From 1853	Life insurance for individual enslaved people	Seven policies found, some covering multiple lives; ledger book with names 21	Active participation in commodifying human lives
United States Life Insurance Company (AIG predecessor)	Slavery era	Life insurance for individual enslaved people	Magazine replica of policy for slave "Charles"; names from bound registries 21	Historical complicity in slave economy
Nautilus Insurance Company (New York Life predecessor)	1845-1848	Life insurance for individual enslaved people	339 of first 1,000 policies on lives of slaves; paid $1,050 in 3 death claims 21	Significant portion of early business derived from slavery
London Assurance Company	From 1720	Marine cargo insurance for slave ships	Slavery-related voyages accounted for 26.4% to 29% of risks underwritten; insured over half of London slavers 23	Deep financial incentive to maintain slave trade
General Industry Practice	Late 18th C	Cargo insurance premiums	West Indian trade accounted for up to 40% of cargo insurance premiums in London market 14	Pervasive and profitable integration of slavery into insurance
General Industry Practice	Pre-1860s	Life insurance for individual enslaved people	Premiums on black lives often double white lives; policies limited to 2/3 value, 1-7 years 22	Codified dehumanization; risk management for human property

IV. The Dawn of Redemption: The Abolitionist Movement's Spiritual Battle

Granville Sharp and Olaudah Equiano: Unveiling the Atrocity and Galvanizing Public Outrage

The Zong massacre might have remained a hidden horror had it not been for the tireless efforts of abolitionists like Olaudah Equiano and Granville Sharp. Equiano, a formerly enslaved African-born writer and sailor, learned of the atrocity and brought the news to Sharp's attention on March 19, 1783, just days after the initial court ruling.⁶ This direct communication from a survivor of the transatlantic slave trade to a prominent advocate was pivotal.

Granville Sharp, an English scholar and philanthropist, was already a prominent anti-slavery advocate, having secured a landmark ruling in the 1772 Somersett v. Stewart case, which held that slavery had no legal basis in England.²⁶ Incensed by the Zong case, Sharp embarked on a personal campaign to expose the killings, tirelessly publicizing the details and attempting (unsuccessfully) to have the crew prosecuted for murder.⁷ Their efforts ensured that the Zong case became a "cause célèbre," infuriating the public and increasing momentum for the abolitionist movement. The outrage directly contributed to the founding of the Society for Effecting the Abolition of the Slave Trade in 1787, marking a direct line of descent from the Zong affair to organized abolitionist action.⁶ The profound impact of the Zong massacre on the abolitionist movement was not automatic; it required the specific, intentional actions of individuals like Equiano and Sharp to bring it to light and leverage it for broader social and political change. Equiano, as a survivor of slavery, provided authentic, lived witness and moral authority, while Sharp, with his legal expertise and unwavering moral conviction, provided the strategic advocacy and organizational drive. This partnership transformed a hidden atrocity into a public rallying cry, demonstrating the critical role of both direct experience and organized, persistent activism in driving significant social reform. This emphasizes that ethical change often requires courageous individuals to expose injustice and mobilize others, even when facing powerful vested interests and legal systems that protect the status quo. It underscores the importance of amplifying marginalized voices and persistent, strategic advocacy in the face of systemic resistance.

John Newton: From "Wretch" to Advocate – A Journey of Profound Conversion

Central to the spiritual awakening that fueled the abolitionist movement was the remarkable transformation of John Newton. Once a "profligate slave ship captain" who "treated [enslaved people] as cargo" ³⁰, Newton underwent a profound conversion experience, beginning with a storm in 1748.³⁰ He became an Anglican priest in 1764.³⁰

His deep remorse for his past involvement in the slave trade led him to become an outspoken critic. In 1788, he published "Thoughts upon the African Slave Trade," a powerful confession and condemnation of the trade, stating, "I hope it will always be a subject of humiliating reflection to me, that I was, once, an active instrument, in a business at which my heart now shudders".²⁷ This work detailed the horrors he witnessed, including epidemic fevers, the risk of insurrections, and the brutal treatment of enslaved people.²⁷ Newton is most famously known for penning the timeless hymn "Amazing Grace" (1772/1779), a personal testament to God's saving power that he, a former "wretch," had received.²⁹ The hymn's themes of redemption and transformation resonated deeply with the abolitionist cause, becoming an anthem for spiritual and moral liberation.

Newton's journey from direct perpetrator (slave trader) to ardent abolitionist is a powerful narrative of personal redemption. His public confession and detailed, firsthand accounts of the trade's brutality carried immense moral weight precisely because he had lived the depravity he now condemned. This personal transformation lent profound credibility and emotional depth to the abolitionist cause, demonstrating that fundamental change is possible even for those deeply entrenched in unjust systems. His willingness to expose his own complicity served as a powerful moral exemplar. This highlights the transformative power of conscience and faith in driving individuals to confront and rectify past wrongs, becoming powerful advocates for justice. It suggests that authentic ethical leadership can emerge not just from inherent righteousness, but from a place of deep self-reflection, repentance, and a commitment to moral alignment, inspiring others by example.

William Wilberforce: The Tireless Parliamentary Campaigner

William Wilberforce, an Anglican layman and Member of Parliament, became the leading parliamentary spokesman for the abolition of the slave trade in 1787, persuaded by his close friend Prime Minister William Pitt and crucially, mentored by John Newton.³⁰ Newton famously advised him to "serve God where he was," encouraging him to remain in politics to fight for this cause.³⁰

Wilberforce's campaign was a "protracted and difficult struggle" lasting 18 years, facing significant political and economic opposition.³⁶ He challenged powerful economic arguments that claimed abolition would "destroy the economy," countering that the trade was a "lottery" and "ruinous" not only morally but also economically unsustainable.³⁸ His strategies included collecting petitions, female activism, distributing print and graphic images, and delivering powerful, detailed speeches in Parliament that emphasized the "harsh realities" and "moral depravity" of the Middle Passage.³⁶ He meticulously presented "over 850 pages of evidence" against the trade.³⁷

Wilberforce's faith was a key motivator, propelling him through many personal tragedies and setbacks.³⁷ His unwavering determination, combined with the efforts of others, led to the abolition of the slave trade in the British Empire in 1807, and eventually, the abolition of slavery itself in most British colonies in 1833, just days before his death.⁶ The film

Amazing Grace beautifully tells his story, highlighting the spiritual and political dimensions of his fight. Wilberforce faced deeply entrenched economic interests and political opposition that viewed the slave trade as vital to the British economy.³⁷ His success was not solely about moral appeals; he strategically framed abolition as being in Britain's strategic and economic interest, arguing the trade was unsustainable, a "lottery" for merchants, and a moral decay that would leave Britain a "pariah".³⁸ This demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of how to move a political body, even when direct moral appeals might be insufficient, by appealing to their pragmatic and long-term interests. This teaches a valuable lesson for modern advocacy and ethical leadership: while moral conviction is essential, effective change often requires translating ethical principles into practical, even self-interested, arguments that resonate with the audience's existing frameworks (e.g., economic stability, national reputation, long-term sustainability). It highlights the importance of adaptable and multi-faceted persuasive strategies in achieving significant societal shifts.

The Moral Compass: How Christian Conviction Fueled Abolition

The abolitionist movement in England, particularly through figures like Sharp, Newton, and Wilberforce, was deeply rooted in Christian conviction. Their faith provided a powerful "moral and ethical compass" that guided their tireless efforts to correct the grave injustice of slavery. Newton's conversion and subsequent advocacy, Wilberforce's sense of "sacred duty" ³⁷, and Sharp's Evangelical Christian beliefs ³² all underscore the profound spiritual dimension of their fight. They understood that "people are not commodities; they are for caring" and that true justice encompassed righteousness and human dignity. Their commitment was not merely humanitarian but divinely inspired. The connection between the abolitionist movement and Christian conviction is not merely a biographical detail but a causal factor. In a society where slavery was legally and economically entrenched, a moral framework

outside of prevailing commercial norms was necessary to challenge it. Christian teachings on human dignity, redemption, and justice provided this radical ethical foundation, empowering individuals to defy the status quo and pursue a vision of society fundamentally at odds with the prevailing economic order.

Learn more about The Zong from the History

V. Lessons for Today: Reclaiming the Soul of Industry

The Danger of Dehumanization: When Profit Trumps Humanity

The Zong massacre stands as a chilling testament to the extreme consequences when human beings are reduced to mere commodities and profit becomes the "primary arbiter of value." The legal arguments in Gregson v. Gilbert, which explicitly treated enslaved people as "goods" or "chattels" whose loss could be claimed under insurance, highlight a profound ethical void. This reduction of human life to an insurable asset allowed for "calculated cruelty" to be framed as a legitimate business decision, demonstrating how easily moral boundaries can erode when financial gain is prioritized above all else. The Zong case serves as a stark warning about the ethical dangers of any system that assigns monetary value to human life or reduces individuals to data points. It underscores the need for continuous ethical vigilance within financial industries, ensuring that profit never overshadows human dignity and well-being. This applies to modern data analytics, artificial intelligence, and risk assessment, where individuals might inadvertently be reduced to profiles or numbers, potentially obscuring their inherent worth.

Corporate Responsibility and Historical Acknowledgment

The historical involvement of the insurance industry in the transatlantic slave trade, as evidenced by the widespread practice of insuring enslaved people and slave voyages, reveals a deep-seated complicity in one of humanity's greatest atrocities. Major institutions, including Lloyd's of London, were central to this system, acting as the "global centre for insuring that industry".²⁰ The prevalence of slave insurance, accounting for a significant portion of cargo premiums and risks, illustrates how deeply intertwined the financial sector was with the slave economy.¹⁴ This historical financial entrenchment of slavery within the insurance industry highlights a moral imperative for modern corporations to acknowledge this legacy. This extends beyond mere apology to a consideration of how historical injustices continue to impact communities today. It implies a call for corporate social responsibility that actively addresses historical harms, potentially through initiatives that promote equity, access, and community investment, aligning with principles of reparative justice.

Restoring Purpose: A Call to Ethical Practice

The story of the Zong is a historical stain, and its lesson must not be forgotten. It demonstrates how a system, even one as mundane as insurance, can lose its way when it divorces itself from a fundamental respect for human life. When profit becomes the primary arbiter of value, humanity withers. This historical context provides a powerful backdrop for organizations striving to operate with a renewed sense of purpose.

The mission to restore this lost sense of purpose is critical. This involves a commitment to believing that every client is not a claim number but a person, a neighbor, a striving to journey with them, to bring order to the chaos of their loss, and to tirelessly advocate for their just and equitable compensation. Such work represents a humble attempt to manifest a small measure of divine justice in this world. This commitment to treat clients as "people, a neighbor, a brother or sister in Christ" directly counters the historical commodification of human life seen in the Zong case. This commitment to "divine justice" in daily operations demonstrates that ethical business is not merely a compliance issue but a moral imperative rooted in profound respect for human dignity. It positions a firm as a beacon of ethical practice, striving to restore a "lost sense of purpose" to the industry by prioritizing human well-being over purely transactional gains.

Conclusion: A Continuous Call to Conscience

The Zong massacre stands as a stark historical warning against the perils of dehumanization and unchecked commercial greed. The legal and financial mechanisms that enabled such an atrocity underscore the critical need for ethical vigilance within any industry. The journey from the depravity of the Zong to the dawn of abolition, driven by individuals of deep moral and spiritual conviction, offers a powerful testament to the capacity for redemption and systemic change.

May the lessons of the Zong never be forgotten. May its tragedy serve as a constant reminder of the spiritual danger of seeing people as mere numbers. And may those who believe in ethical practice return to the ethical and moral foundations that enabled a "civilized" world to finally correct such a profound wrong. As the Apostle Paul reminds us, "Whatever you do, do it heartily, as to the Lord and not to men." In every claim, it is not just a settlement that is sought, but a restoration of dignity for one's neighbor, for in doing so, one serves the Lord Christ Himself. The Zong's legacy calls for a continuous examination of practices, ensuring that human dignity remains at the forefront, guiding decisions and shaping a more just and compassionate future for all.

---

Works cited

1. A Chain of Murder in the Slave Trade: A Wider Context of the Zong Massacre, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259426986_A_Chain_of_Murder_in_the_Slave_Trade_A_Wider_Context_of_the_Zong_Massacre

2. Zong massacre - Wikipedia, accessed August 12, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zong_massacre

3. Lord Mansfield and the Slave Ship Zong - JASNA, accessed August 12, 2025, https://jasna.org/publications-2/persuasions-online/volume-41-no-2/christmas/

4. The Middle Passage (U.S. National Park Service), accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.nps.gov/articles/the-middle-passage.htm

5. 18th Century Atlantic Economy | George Washington's Mount Vernon, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.mountvernon.org/george-washington/slavery/18th-century-atlantic-economy

6. Zong massacre | History, British Slave Ship, Legal Case, Abolition ..., accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/event/Zong-massacre

7. The Zong - Understanding Slavery Initiative, accessed August 12, 2025, https://understandingslavery.com/casestudy/the-zong/

8. The Zong Massacre Begins - African American Registry, accessed August 12, 2025, https://aaregistry.org/story/the-zong-massacre-episode-begins/

9. The experiences of enslaved people | National Museums Scotland, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.nms.ac.uk/discover-catalogue/the-experiences-of-enslaved-people

10. A New Look at the Zong Case of 1783 - OpenEdition Journals, accessed August 12, 2025, https://journals.openedition.org/1718/1808?lang=en

11. The Zong Massacre (1781) | BlackPast.org, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.blackpast.org/global-african-history/zong-massacre-1781/

12. The Zong Massacre 1781: The Legal and Public Debate Surrounding the Morality of the Atlantic Slave Trade, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.ijahss.com/Paper/08012023/1179451742.pdf

13. Aboard the Zong: Remembering a Massacre - New Histories - University of Sheffield, accessed August 12, 2025, https://newhistories.sites.sheffield.ac.uk/volumes/2011-12/volume-3/issue-7-open-theme/aboard-the-zong-remembering-a-massacre

14. The story of the Zong slave ship: a mass murder masquerading as an insurance claim | Studying law | The Guardian, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/law/2021/jan/19/the-story-of-the-zong-slave-ship-a-mass-masquerading-as-an-insurance-claim

15. A New Look at the Zong Case of 1783 - OpenEdition Journals, accessed August 12, 2025, https://journals.openedition.org/1718/1808

16. Slavery, Insurance, and Sacrifice: The Embodiment of Capital (Chapter 1), accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/logic-of-slavery/slavery-insurance-and-sacrifice-the-embodiment-of-capital/B76F104A30319651E79D415A7F6CED61

17. The Zong case study, accessed August 12, 2025, http://archive.understandingslavery.com/index.php-option=com_content&view=article&id=373&Itemid=236.html

18. The-slave-ship-Zong.pdf - Slavery Links, accessed August 12, 2025, https://slaverylinks.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/The-slave-ship-Zong.pdf

19. Anti-slavery campaigns in Britain and their impact on the formation of the United States, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.pambazuka.org/anti-slavery-campaigns-britain-and-their-impact-formation-united-states

20. The transatlantic slave trade - Lloyd's, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.lloyds.com/about-lloyds/history/the-trans-atlantic-slave-trade

21. Slavery Era Insurance Registry Report, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.insurance.ca.gov/01-consumers/150-other-prog/10-seir/slavery-era-report.cfm

22. Slave Insurance - Encyclopedia Virginia, accessed August 12, 2025, https://encyclopediavirginia.org/entries/slave-insurance/

23. Full article: Underwriting and Investing in Slavery: The London Assurance Company in the Atlantic World - Taylor & Francis Online, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0144039X.2025.2523494?src=

24. Nov. 29, 1781: Zong Massacre - Zinn Education Project, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.zinnedproject.org/news/tdih/zong-massacre/

25. The Role of Survivors in the Historical Antislavery Movement - University of Nottingham, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/research/beacons-of-excellence/rights-lab/resources/reports-and-briefings/2019/september/the-role-of-survivors.pdf

26. Granville Sharp - Wikipedia, accessed August 12, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Granville_Sharp

27. John Newton (1725-1807) — Rochester Cathedral, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.rochestercathedral.org/research/johnnewton

28. Thoughts upon the African Slave Trade - Wikisource, the free online library, accessed August 12, 2025, https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Thoughts_upon_the_African_Slave_Trade

29. The Creation of "Amazing Grace" | Articles and Essays - Library of Congress, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.loc.gov/collections/amazing-grace/articles-and-essays/creation-of-amazing-grace/

30. Did you know?...Amazing Grace and the story of abolitionists Newton and Wilberforce - DVIDS, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.dvidshub.net/news/265744/did-you-knowamazing-grace-and-story-abolitionists-newton-and-wilberforce

31. Granville Sharp - Equiano's World, accessed August 12, 2025, https://equianosworld.org/associates-abolition.php?id=6

32. Granville Sharp | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/granville-sharp

33. How Law Destroyed the Slave Trade - Bindmans LLP, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.bindmans.com/news-insights/blogs/how-law-destroyed-the-slave-trade/

34. The Conversion of 'Amazing Grace' Writer John Newton, 1748 - Landmark Events, accessed August 12, 2025, https://landmarkevents.org/the-conversion-of-amazing-grace-writer-john-newton-1748/

35. Revisiting the Story behind Former Slave Ship Captain John Newton's Amazing Grace. - JMU Scholarly Commons, accessed August 12, 2025, https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&context=mhr

36. Wilberforce makes the case - UK Parliament, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/transformingsociety/tradeindustry/slavetrade/overview/wilberforce-makes-the-case/

37. William Wilberforce: Triumph Over Britain's Slave Trade - Indiana Historical Society, accessed August 12, 2025, https://indianahistory.org/wp-content/uploads/triumphoverbritainsslavetrade.pdf

38. William Wilberforce's History-Changing Speech Against Slavery, accessed August 12, 2025, https://mediashower.com/blog/william-wilberforces-speech/

Christian Europe Abolished Slavery